CD Projekt RED"s third Witcher combines the series" non-linear storytelling through a sprawling open world that concludes the saga that Geralt of Rivia.
You are watching: Do i need to play witcher 1 before 2
I"m not sure I fully understand but yes you have the right to probably skip the Witcher 1 for a range of different reasons.
As for exactly how much one"s savegames from Witcher 1 & 2 will affect 3, i can"t comment since I simply don"t know. But, I will say that when it pertains to the first 2 games, ns actually took pleasure in the story in 1 more than ns did in 2. However, gameplay-wise I believed 2 was much better (mostly the combat).
I am certain you deserve to just skip 1 (and most likely 2 as well) and also be simply fine play 3, however given that both the enlarge games cost next come nothing these days and also frequently popular music up in GOG and vapor sales; if you have the time I"d say go for it. In spite of some flaws and klunky bits, both are terrific RPGs in their own right, giving plenty of hours of fun.
I"m replaying the very first game best now. I highly doubt any kind of story decisions will impact Witcher III in any type of way. However, it"s still a really good (and fairly weird) RPG. It doesn"t yes, really play quite favor anything else. I"m surprised at just how much I"m enjoy it it ~ above a 2nd playthrough plenty of years later.
If you have actually time I would certainly recommend play 1 and also 2. When the choices will most likely be more of a nod come witcher fans and a couple of minor scene I would still introduce it. And also while w2 is a better game , the initial is more atmospheric and felt the environments and quests were more personal and grounded. And also the initial sore is therefore much better than the 2nd one. So like I stated if you have actually 60+ hrs for both games prior to W3 give it a shot. It establishes Geralt who he is and also such.
Keep in mind that the first one is fairly slow paced and the combat is not its forte. And the voice exhilaration is no as good for npcs and also so on. Its one old pc game. For this reason yeah. But personally I prefer W1 far much more than W2 also if the gameplay part of the is no as good.
ns tried come play the an initial Witcher game and also couldn"t gain into the for part reason. I just offered up 6 hours in.
I read a story summary online and jumped straight into 2 and loved it.
I"m currently playing the Witcher 1 because that the very first time. That is a an extremely slow start, the took until act 2 to acquire me hooked, however now that ns realized what the video game actually is it"s amazing. The game isn"t because that everyone, however I"d to speak play witcher 1 atleast until, and also a little of, action 2.
Your selections are so i can not qualify to matter it is beyond unimportant to play it. Castle barely mattered in Witcher 2. Also yes, the gameplay is actually pretty bad so the is precious skipping for the too. If girlfriend really desire an appreciation because that what is going on in witcher 3 and also the characters connected you should read the books, no play the games.
If you like the an initial game, friend should finish it. It"s quite cool. However yeah as far as choices and also saves go, you might as well skip it.
Your selections are so i can not qualify to issue it is past unimportant to play it. Castle barely mattered in Witcher 2.
Yeh because that story and also worldstate factors theres no need to play 1 and 2. 1 is the better game but the gameplay in 2 is probably much the very same as in 3 for this reason if girlfriend wanna obtain in mood because that TW3 play part TW2.
The only reason to play the very first game is if you desire to know more about the lore and also the world. That"s a decision girlfriend can quickly make later on after you"ve perfect the Witcher 2 due to the fact that I can"t see that your decisions would certainly play into the second game at every anyway. What I appreciated of the Witcher 1 was greatly the story and finding out more about the world, however I likewise found the to be a bit of a slog ~ a while. It"s not specifically a brief game, IIRC.
Shouldn"t we have learned by now that story options don"t really average anything. If you desire to recognize the story, you have to play both games.
You additionally shouldn"t skip one and play two. One is a better game. The story is much better and I choose the gameplay. It"s a little clunky however it"s unique and works well once you figure it out. In the second one they make it an ext in line with exactly how every other third person game plays.
I yes, really can"t to speak what"s walk to bring over right into this game"s story yet.
Anyways, ns think 2 is much much better than 1 (which is really great in some areas and really flawed in others). No that 2 is perfect but as whole I think it"s certainly far better and more approachable. If you have the time and really want to go earlier to 1 it"s always there.
Obviously some 1 fans in this thread but all at once I"d say it"s much less popular. My biggest issue was it was the pacing and also I believed it was also long. I"m guessing an ext things native 2 lug over (from story to options to gameplay mechanics).
i think it"s worth playing the Witcher 1 ~ above easy just for the story. The combat is not great, and also playing it on straightforward is pretty lot the same video game with much faster combat (and less chance that losing, naturally).
It"s also perfectly fine come skip the Witcher 1, honestly.
Witcher 1 had an excellent story and also it collection the world much better than the W2. Likewise Witcher 1 feels more like a witcher sort of adventure - at the very least comparing to the very first book stories. I doubt that the choices carry over in any kind of meaningful way.
How about the books? knife of Destiny was good introduction to the human being of the witcher and the Last wish has necessary chapter relating come the W3.
artisanbreads: the less popular becouse it to be a relativly unknown game which noone played. That the Demon souls the the souls series. Most civilization that proposal 2 over 1 either "tried" to play 1 after playing 2 many years after its release or they didnt play it at all. Like
punched claimed the combat is bad in both games yet at least its distinctive in 1. Ns dont suppose the combat to it is in very an excellent in 3 either.
artisanbreads: its less well-known becouse it to be a relativly unknown game which noone played. That is the Demon souls of the souls series. Most world that recommends 2 over 1 one of two people "tried" to play 1 after playing 2 countless years after ~ its relax or they didnt play it at all. Like
punched claimed the combat is poor in both games however at least its unique in 1. I dont mean the combat to be very an excellent in 3 either.
No ns played that right once it came out and then play 2. Ns think there"s plenty come not like in 1. I choose the combat in 2 a lot of more, even though it end up gift repetitive.
Not saying it"s a poor game overall but there"s pretty large issues with it come me.
artisanbreads: ns was commenting on TW1 being all at once less renowned not your stance top top it. You made great arguments and also theres nothing dorn with putting 2 above 1 if thats exactly how you feel.
Th inquiry of story and also choice repercussion has been answered however I just wanted to write-up to say that ns much wanted Witcher 1 at the finish of the day. That feels old and also has the flaws, yet once friend play for a bit and get past some antiquated aspects, i feel it"s much more rewarding of an experience. Also somehow i really chosen the combat, i m sorry I recognize isn"t the most famous opinion.
i haven"t play 2 yet so no talk about that one. Ns completed the very first one a couple years earlier and have to admit that I driven myself come beat it due to the fact that I didn"t desire to leave it unfinished. That said, i did reap playing through the first half or 3/4 of the game. To it is in honest, I only bought the second one because it dropped down to $5 and also I thought, "Hey, it"s worth it to me to shot it the end for a pair hours for five bucks." ~ looking right into reviews more, I"m fairly excited in ~ this point. I just set up it yesterday for the first time. (I"ve been working with a backlog of games.)
I think i would have liked The Witcher 1 more if it wasn"t for the dumb Alvin subplot. (Which led into the also dumber twisted ending.)
It kinda reminded me of something like Skyrim, in that the most interesting stuff happened to the side of the story. The key plot to be pretty throwaway and also forgettable. It"s pretty good at civilization building, however it more than likely won"t be that pertinent to 3.
That being said, ns did enjoy it enough that I almost immediately went out and bought the very first Witcher publication after finishing it, therefore take the for what you will.
You have to play The Witcher simply to see exactly how much of an advancement The Witcher 2 is. Take it from that what you will.
I liked the Witcher 1 fairly a bit, and also liked the Witcher 2 a bit much less so. 1 felt very unique, nothing else favor it.
I have the right to understand wanting to skip the first one, I had actually to pressure myself come play the video game up till the last chapter (maybe second to last?) once shit struggle the fan and things obtained interesting.
But friend will miss out on opportunities to do allies i m sorry will aid you in the sequel. I"m guessing the deafult begin on Witcher 2 suspect you"ve make no great friends in the an initial game. It will still be a fun game though. Walk ahead and skip 1 if girlfriend want.
See more: Neck Pain? Nope Essential Oil For Stiff Neck Pain In Chicago
I never ever played 2 but right now i"m playing with the first game, about 8 hours in and it has absolutely been a an excellent experience therefore far. You should gain it, it"s on sale pretty frequently too, i gained it for around 1€ or something choose that.
I simply finished The Witcher 2 again. I an initial played it near the finish of 2013; this was prior to I purchase the very first on Steam, as I had bought the very first last year, and had just beat that on Monday. When I would certainly say girlfriend don"t need to play it; that goes because that either of lock really, i would fully recommend girlfriend play both. Ns think you"d get an ext out that the suffer if you played both. Simply playing The Witcher 2 again, i had completely forgot a the majority of the story, so ns am happy i replayed it, and also I evaluate the story and also characters a bit much more due to playing the first. Ns am yes, really happy ns played both the first two games. I"m prepared for three currently :). That said, I"ll have to use the Bard (or everyone the character will certainly be) that implements my selections from the very first two games into three, because I play the very first on Steam, The Witcher 2 top top 360, and also I"ll most likely be playing 3 on the PS4. If i were you, I"d regret not playing the first, but that"s me. Also, I assumed both had far better qualities come them over the other, so neither of them to be overall much better than the other I think. I need to say the an initial takes time to gain into though; I had actually played the on and off in brief bursts beforehand on, but it finally clicked at some point, especially due to the fact that I wanted to watch it through prior to three. Ns recommend omitted the contract missions.